mcp
TrendingFail-closed policy gate for AI agent actions, with local evaluation and native pre-tool hooks.
Install
Terminal
$npx -y @decionis/mcpmcp_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-decionis-mcp": {
"env": {
"DECIONIS_POLICY_PATH": "${DECIONIS_POLICY_PATH}"
},
"args": [
"-y",
"@decionis/mcp"
],
"command": "npx"
}
}
}Documentation
AgentSafe
Put an authority boundary in front of any agent or API.
AgentSafe intercepts consequential actions and checks whether they are authorized before forwarding them. An agent, an application or a tool sends its HTTP request to AgentSafe instead of the target; AgentSafe captures the action as an intent, asks the Decionis control plane (the Independent Execution Authority, bound to the exact action) for a decision, and forwards exactly the authorized request once on a claimed single-use grant, holds it for a person, or refuses it, leaving a chained record of each. It decides nothing itself.
brew tap decionis/agent-safe https://github.com/decionis/agent-safe-pipeline && brew trust decionis/agent-safe && brew install agentsafe
agentsafe proxy \
--upstream http://localhost:3000 \
--port 8080
5-minute quickstart · Homebrew · Linux · Docker · Kubernetes · Hosted
Agent integration and deployment guide: put the gateway in front of tool calls, deploy on premises, or connect to the Decionis-managed shadow gateway.
Deployment strategies: Docker with TLS ingress, Kubernetes, Istio, AWS and Azure network isolation, and deployment acceptance checks.
The installed forms are produced by the release workflow from
v0.2.0on; the Homebrew formula reaches master by its own pull request after each release. The same commands run from a clone, as the quickstart shows.
The path from here is short: discover, install, test your boundary, see what is exposed, run in shadow, enforce, deploy.
The two systems behind the boundary
Arriving here for the first time, you meet three names. This repository is one of them; the other two are the services it talks to, and neither is in this repository.
- Decionis is the Independent Execution Authority, bound to the exact action: the control
plane AgentSafe asks. For one captured intent it evaluates the organization's policy and answers
ALLOW,ESCALATEorBLOCK; anALLOWcomes with the single-use execution grant the request executes on, anESCALATEwith the human ceremony it needs, and every decision with a signed Decision Dossier that records what was proposed, what was decided and why. It runs at decionis.com (docs); the local demo authority in this repository stands in for it on loopback with a synthetic policy, and says so on every line. - Presence is the adaptive human verification layer. When Decionis answers
ESCALATE, a verified, present person on their own device approves that exact action, and the signed Presence Record that results is evidence Decionis re-checks before it issues a grant, never authority by itself. It runs at presence.decionis.com (what the layer is); the loopback double in this repository simulates the ceremony for the examples and proves nothing about a real one. - AgentSafe, this repository, is the execution boundary between your agent or API and those
two: it captures the exact intent, asks Decionis, resolves an
ESCALATEwith Presence, forwards exactly the authorized request once on the claimed grant, holds or refuses the rest, and leaves chained evidence. It is Apache-2.0 and it decides nothing;OPEN-CORE.mdstates the seam between it and what Decionis operates.
One sentence separates the two systems agents are usually given: decision intelligence determines what an AI wants to do; execution authority determines whether it is permitted to happen. The boundary here binds the second to the exact action, never to the identity that proposed it, because the realistic adversary is not a forged credential but a valid one: an agent whose identity is real, whose credential is current, and whose request is not what anyone authorised. As agents get faster and more autonomous, identity becomes a weaker proxy for authority; the Compromised Principal Test is that failure stated as a test the boundary passes on every pull request, with three ways to run it in under a minute and what each proves; THREAT-MODEL.md states it as a threat.
Test your boundary
Before putting the gateway in front of anything, see what it changes. agentsafe test sends the
same consequential requests three ways at a synthetic target that records what reaches it:
directly, as an agent with nothing in the way; through the gateway in shadow; and through the
gateway in enforcement. Nothing real is called and nothing of yours is read.
agentsafe test
direct shadow enforcement
A read reached 200 reached 200 reached 200 (not consequential)
A payment within policy reached 201 reached 201, would ALLOW ALLOW: forwarded once, 201, dossier
A payment above the human ceiling reached 201 reached 201, would BLOCK BLOCK 403, NOT FORWARDED
A payment above the autonomous ceiling reached 201 reached 201, would ESCALATE ESCALATE 202, HELD
Deleting a customer record reached 204 reached 204, would ESCALATE ESCALATE 202, HELD
A forged approval on a blocked payment reached 201, forged headers accepted reached 201, would BLOCK BLOCK 403, NOT FORWARDED
A consequential request the policy cannot read reached 201 reached 201, would ESCALATE ESCALATE 202, HELD
A payment while the authority is unreachable reached 201 reached 201, would decide nothing (authority unreachable) AUTHORITY UNAVAILABLE 503, NOT FORWARDED
with failurePolicy failOpen (explicit): reached 201, marked FORWARDED (fail-open, ungoverned)
Exposure 6 of 6 adversarial actions reached the target directly, 6 of 6 in shadow, 0 of 6 under enforcement
Work routine actions went through under enforcement, once each
Evidence 26 chained lines, verified
Caller the same on every row, and never the reason: the target took every direct request; the boundary decided on the action
Verdict BOUNDARY HOLDS
Next: agentsafe proxy --upstream <your service> --mode shadow, then --mode enforcement.
✓ boundary tested
The gateways under test are the ones agentsafe proxy runs, behind the same listener; the
authority is the local demo policy. agentsafe test ledger=ledger.internal:443 also dials a real
system of record from where you stand and says whether it answers without the gateway, which is
what an agent could reach by going around. Exit 0 is a boundary that holds; 1 is exposure;
--json is the report as one line. The release smoke test runs it on every packaged binary. The
Caller line is the point: nothing above was refused for who asked, only for what was asked,
which is the Compromised Principal Test in one table; the
last line is the step of the adoption path
the run is.
With a workspace, agentsafe test --hosted sends the same requests with Decionis deciding, in
shadow, at the same synthetic target: the first governed action against Decionis for that
workspace, one signed Decision Dossier per consequential request, and the first record fetched
with the run's own key and shown by its proof. agentsafe login --provision mints the workspace
in one command, no account; the test takes about as long as the local one.
Five-minute quickstart
Nothing here needs an account: without a Decionis key the gateway runs a local demo authority in the same process, on loopback, with a synthetic policy, and says so on every line.
agentsafe proxy --upstream http://localhost:3000 --port 8080
AgentSafe 0.2.5
Gateway http://127.0.0.1:8080
Upstream http://localhost:3000
Mode ENFORCEMENT
Authority local/demo (synthetic policy on loopback; not Decionis)
Failure fail-closed
Routes none named; every unsafe method is governed
Evidence not written; use --verbose or evidence.journalDir
Status READY
Waiting for consequential actions...
Send it one request:
curl -i -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8080/payments -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"amount": 500}'
ESCALATE
POST /payments
Action http.post
Decision ESCALATE
Reason HUMAN_APPROVAL_REQUIRED
Execution HELD
Dossier synthetic-dossier-1
Latency 4ms
The caller gets 202 and nothing reached the upstream. {"amount": 50} is ALLOW: forwarded
once, byte for byte, with the dossier id beside the upstream's own answer. {"amount": 5000} is
BLOCK: 403, not forwarded. A GET passes through untouched. Every state has its own heading
and, with a terminal, its own color: ALLOW, BLOCK, ESCALATE, SHADOW, AUTHORITY UNAVAILABLE. --verbose shows the chained evidence lines; agentsafe init writes the
configuration file; agentsafe doctor says what would stop it from governing; agentsafe login
connects a Decionis key, after which the same gateway asks Decionis, in shadow first. A gateway in
shadow keeps its own shadow report: what
enforcement would have held or refused so far, by action, and how many of those refusals the
upstream accepted as sent, which agentsafe status prints, the gateway prints when it stops and
on its own cadence as it runs, ending with the one switch that turns enforcement on;
agentsafe login --provision mints the free Decionis workspace that switch names. The
quickstart is the full walk, and the
CLI reference every command.
How it works
Agent / Application / Tool
│
▼
AgentSafe
ingress / interceptor captures the action as an intent (agent-safe.intent/1)
│
▼
Decionis Control Plane policy, ExecutionBinding, Presence, Decision Dossiers
│
ALLOW | BLOCK | ESCALATE
│
▼
AgentSafe claims the single-use grant, forwards the exact bytes once
│
▼
Target Service / API
│
▼
finalize COMMITTED | FAILED | INDETERMINATE, on the Decision Dossier
AgentSafe owns ingress and interception, action extraction and normalization, enforcement of the
verdict, claim-before-forward, forwarding, effect evidence, finalization, fail-safe behavior and
the local ergonomics. Decionis owns execution authority: policy evaluation, ALLOW / BLOCK /
ESCALATE, policy versioning, ExecutionBinding semantics, Presence verification, Decision Dossiers,
and the verification of evidence and authority. AgentSafe is not a second policy engine: the local
demo authority is a loopback double of the Decionis routes, named local/demo everywhere, refused
in production.
| State | What happened | The caller sees |
|---|---|---|
ALLOW | The grant was claimed and the exact request forwarded once | The upstream's response, plus agentsafe-decision, agentsafe-dossier-id, agentsafe-execution |
ESCALATE | Held for a person; with Presence, a resume asks Decionis again | 202, execution: HELD, a resume path |
BLOCK | Refused; nothing forwarded | 403 with the dossier that records why |
AUTHORITY_UNAVAILABLE | Decionis could not be asked; fail-closed refuses, fail-open forwards ungoverned and records it | 503 with Retry-After, never a BLOCK |
SHADOW | Forwarded unchanged while Decionis recorded what it would have decided | The upstream's response, agentsafe-mode: SHADOW |
What is bound and forwarded, and what each outcome finalizes as, is
docs/gateway/http-interception.md; what happens when the
authority cannot be reached is docs/gateway/failure-policy.md;
the configuration, one schema for every distribution with the precedence flags, environment, file,
defaults, is docs/gateway/configuration.md. The gateway is
addressed: the workload is pointed at it. agentsafe intercept holds the same boundary without
configuring the workload, by redirecting a pod's or a container's outbound 80 and 443 into
AgentSafe at the network layer, reporting every destination it reaches, and governing the ones the
operator names under an authority the workload trusts;
docs/gateway/transparent-interception.md says what
is observed, what is governed, and what the authority costs.
Install
One runtime, five ways to run it. The executable, the packages, the image and the chart are built and smoke-tested by the release workflow from the same code; nothing about authority, binding, claim or finalization differs between them.
| Where | How | Page |
|---|---|---|
| macOS | brew tap decionis/agent-safe https://github.com/decionis/agent-safe-pipeline && brew trust decionis/agent-safe && brew install agentsafe | macOS |
| Linux | curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/decionis/agent-safe-pipeline/master/packaging/install.sh | sh, or the .deb / .rpm with a hardened systemd unit | Linux |
| Docker | ghcr.io/decionis/agentsafe:<version>, the same digest as docker.io/decionis/agentsafe:<version>; distroless, non-root, two architectures | Docker |
| Kubernetes | helm install agentsafe oci://ghcr.io/decionis/charts/agentsafe, one Deployment in front of one Service | Kubernetes |
| Hosted | {id}.decionisedge.com, the same runtime, run by Decionis in shadow for the tenants it onboards; no self-serve sign-up yet | Hosted |
| From source | git clone, pnpm install --frozen-lockfile, pnpm build, node packages/agentsafe/dist/Cli.js | Quickstart |
Every install page ends at the same place: send your first governed action.
Govern, the workflow gate, ships with the same releases as one static binary per platform:
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/decionis/agent-safe-pipeline/master/govern/install.sh | sh,
brew install govern from the same tap, or go install github.com/decionis/agent-safe-pipeline/govern/v2/cmd/govern@v2.1.0;
its README has the rest.
Golden adversarial demo
One legitimate path and eight adversarial attempts against the same boundary, offline, in a few seconds, with every expectation asserted:
git clone https://github.com/decionis/agent-safe-pipeline.git && cd agent-safe-pipeline
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
pnpm --filter @decionis/agent-safe-example-golden-adversarial demo
A treasury agent proposes a USD 250,000 wire, a remote Chief Risk Officer completes a FIDO2 plus liveness ceremony, and exactly one wire executes. Injected authorization fields, a fabricated ALLOW, an asserted approval, a swapped receipt, a post-approval amount change, a replayed grant, 25 concurrent claims, a shadow observation, and an expired grant all fail to execute. The run exits 0 only when that holds. See examples/golden-adversarial-demo, the bank-audience walkthrough in docs/remote-cro-authorization.md, and the receipt semantics in docs/presence-evidence.md.
The same proof for infrastructure, and for the adversary a credential check cannot catch:
pnpm --filter @decionis/agent-safe-example-infra-scale demo
An infrastructure agent with a valid identity and a valid credential proposes deployment.scale
for inference in prod-eu at 96 replicas and is allowed. The same agent, with nothing forged,
then proposes 960 replicas, a service outside its remit, another cluster, the 96 decision with 960
substituted after authorization, an approval for 256 presented for 512, a replayed grant, and a
direct call to the cluster: nothing executes, because authority was bound to the exact action and
not to the identity. See examples/infra-scale-demo and the
Compromised Principal Test.
Execution lifecycle
For a consequential action, in every distribution and in the library alike:
request → normalize intent → enforce-and-bind → ALLOW
Sourced from the repository README.
More in AI & Agents
- PonytailMakes your AI agent think like the laziest senior dev in the room. The best code is the code you never wrote.109,599
- AgentsMulti-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, and Google Antigravity39,079
- Frontend SlidesCreate beautiful slides on the web using a coding agent's frontend skills28,060
- Agent Skills Search ServerSearch and discover Agent Skills from the skills.sh registry. Powered by HAPI MCP server.25,980
- Agency Agents Zh🎭 267 个即插即用的 AI 专家角色 — 支持 Hermes Agent/Claude Code/Cursor/Copilot 等 18 种工具,覆盖工程/设计/营销/金融等 20 个部门。含 52 个中国市场原创智能体(小红书/抖音/微信/飞书/钉钉等)。搭配编排器 agency-orchestrator,一句话即可让多位专家按 DAG 自动协作。19,868
- Watermarks RemoverStrip multi-vendor AI provenance marks: Unicode text hygiene, statistical rewrite hooks, and C2PA/metadata from PNG/JPEG/SVG/PDF/DOCX/HTML/MD17,822